問題文
The handbook gives every member of the sitting an equal voice and settles the matter by a show of hands, and that is how it went; no agenda was drawn up for it beforehand. The two benefits could not both be kept, so the board had to give up one to keep the other and chose the second; no rule anywhere lays down how such a choice is to be made. What has to be true of that sitting, and of the board's choice?
選択肢
- Under the organization's misrepresentation heading the plan must hold the outlined session that the secretariat filed in September, and it must hold the standardized decision set apart from it in the treasury file.
- Under the organization's misrepresentation heading the plan must hold the outlined session that the secretariat filed in September, and it must hold the tradeoff decision set apart from it in the treasury file.
- Under the organization's misrepresentation heading the plan must hold the democratic session that the secretariat filed in September, and it must hold the tradeoff decision set apart from it in the treasury file.
- Under the organization's misrepresentation heading the plan must hold the democratic session that the secretariat filed in September, and it must hold the standardized decision set apart from it in the treasury file.