問題文
A metadata file has drifted away from the attributes beside it, and how far the type name reaches is disputed too. A pair of lines accounts for both. Which pairing is correct?
選択肢
- That metadata file will not follow the attributes on its own, so the two are kept in step by rote, and the native type name fixes the reach of the connector, which also covers the parts that descend from it.
- That metadata file will not follow the attributes on its own, so the two are kept in step by hand, and the native type name fixes the reach of the connector, which also covers the parts that disband from it.
- That metadata file will not follow the attributes on its own, so the two are kept in step by rote, and the native type name fixes the reach of the connector, which also covers the parts that disband from it.
- That metadata file will not follow the attributes on its own, so the two are kept in step by hand, and the native type name fixes the reach of the connector, which also covers the parts that descend from it.