問題文
A team defines a group by picking the production machines it knows about today. Six months later, half of production is not covered. What property of the alternative would have prevented that?
選択肢
- A hand-picked group would have covered them because it matches by name pattern, so any machine named after the production prefix joins it as soon as it exists.
- A hand-picked group can be configured to re-evaluate on a schedule, which is the recommended way to keep it current, so the failure here was in not enabling that scheduled refresh rather than in the choice of group type.
- Nothing would have prevented it; groups do not affect coverage, since scanning reaches every asset in the account whether or not some group happens to name it.
- A group defined by filters keeps evaluating the criteria, so assets created later that satisfy them are included without anyone editing the group.