フリー問題

問題文

A program inside a container expects a scheduler to run a periodic task and expects an init system to reap orphaned children. Which of those assumptions can it keep, and what should replace them?

選択肢

1. The periodic work should move to a sidecar owned by the platform rather than to a daemon inside the volume, and the reaping problem is solved by a tiny init as the first process, because the process with the lowest identifier inside a container does not behave like a full dispatcher and will not adopt an orphaned thread by itself.
2. The periodic work should move to a controller owned by the platform rather than to a daemon inside the image, and the reaping problem is solved by a tiny init as the first process, because the process with the lowest identifier inside a container does not behave like a full supervisor and will not adopt an orphaned process by itself.
3. The periodic work should move to a controller owned by the platform rather than to a daemon inside the image, and the reaping problem is solved by a tiny init as the first process, because the process with the lowest identifier inside a container does not behave like a full dispatcher and will not adopt an orphaned thread by itself.
4. The periodic work should move to a sidecar owned by the platform rather than to a daemon inside the volume, and the reaping problem is solved by a tiny init as the first process, because the process with the lowest identifier inside a container does not behave like a full supervisor and will not adopt an orphaned process by itself.