問題文
On one node of a pair, the output of show chassis high-availability information reports the first services redundancy group as INELIGIBLE with a failure event of IP, while the node status is online and the cold synchronization with the peer reads complete. Which conclusion follows from that output?
選択肢
- The group has lost the interface it monitors, because the code that names an event of an interface and the code that names an event of an address are interchangeable in this output, and the group is ineligible either way, so the two cases need not be told apart.
- The monitoring of a remote address configured for that group has failed on this node, so the group is ineligible here while the node itself and the exchange over the interchassis link are healthy.
- The address that the group watches is the address of the peer node itself, so the event reports that the peer has stopped answering the probe of this node although the link that joins them is still carrying state.
- The two lists of codes overlap with each other, so an event of IP on a group can also be raised by the monitoring of the loopback of the node, which is why the state of this node and the state of the group have to be read as one before the group is called ineligible.