問題文
An architect states that the new description is easy to follow, on the grounds that it was written with great care. A reviewer objects that this particular verdict is not the writer's to give. Which pairing states who settles that verdict, and which further property the text has to hold anyway?
選択肢
- Being easy to follow cannot be declared by the writer, so only the reading group can judge its plain novelty and the text must separately hold one checked elegance throughout that architectural documentation.
- Being easy to follow cannot be declared by the writer, so only the reading group can judge its plain novelty and the text must separately hold one checked correctness throughout that architectural documentation.
- Being easy to follow cannot be declared by the writer, so only the reading group can judge its plain readability and the text must separately hold one checked correctness throughout that architectural documentation.
- Being easy to follow cannot be declared by the writer, so only the reading group can judge its plain readability and the text must separately hold one checked elegance throughout that architectural documentation.