フリー問題

問題文

A manufacturer's stated risk appetite says it will not accept AI-driven decisions that affect employee pay without human review. A business unit proposes an AI tool that recommends overtime allocations, which directly affect pay. What should the risk practitioner conclude?

選択肢

1. The use case is acceptable as it stands because a recommendation is only advisory and the appetite statement applies to decisions rather than to recommendations.
2. The use case is acceptable only if a reviewer with authority to overturn the recommendation is placed before the allocation takes effect.
3. The appetite statement should be amended so that the use case fits inside it.
4. The use case must be rejected because the stated appetite prohibits any AI involvement in decisions that affect employee pay and regardless of the controls that are placed around it.