フリー問題

問題文

Two more matters of housekeeping are checked. First, a port has been renamed and its width changed, and the developer finds that of the two kinds of dependency the tool knows about, only one of them takes the new name along with the rest of the change. Second, the developer wants two versions of one object drawn side by side, and learns that this is possible for one of the two kinds of object but not for the other. Which pairing fits?

選択肢

1. The implicit sort of dependency takes only the kind, the width, the digits and the note, and the link path sort of dependency takes the new name along with the rest, while the non-composite sort of object cannot have two of its versions drawn side by side and the composite sort of object can have two of them drawn that way.
2. The link path sort of dependency takes only the kind, the width, the digits and the note, and the implicit sort of dependency takes the new name along with the rest, while the composite sort of object cannot have two of its versions drawn side by side and the non-composite sort of object can have two of them drawn that way.
3. The implicit sort of dependency takes only the kind, the width, the digits and the note, and the link path sort of dependency takes the new name along with the rest, while the composite sort of object cannot have two of its versions drawn side by side and the non-composite sort of object can have two of them drawn that way.
4. The link path sort of dependency takes only the kind, the width, the digits and the note, and the implicit sort of dependency takes the new name along with the rest, while the non-composite sort of object cannot have two of its versions drawn side by side and the composite sort of object can have two of them drawn that way.