問題文
One rule is meant to protect a single published service, and another is meant to protect every address on the device. The team wrote both in the same place, and the second one is being skipped for some traffic. Which pairing of statements is correct?
選択肢
- The two rules belong in the merged scope that matches their intent, and the skipped traffic is explained by the random precedence the delivery infrastructure evaluates for each context.
- The two rules belong in the respective scope that matches their intent, and the skipped traffic is explained by the narrower precedence the delivery infrastructure evaluates for each context.
- The two rules belong in the respective scope that matches their intent, and the skipped traffic is explained by the random precedence the delivery infrastructure evaluates for each context.
- The two rules belong in the merged scope that matches their intent, and the skipped traffic is explained by the narrower precedence the delivery infrastructure evaluates for each context.