問題文
Before restoring, the team scans the candidate copies against current threat information and reviews the known vulnerabilities of the systems they contain. Why is the second of those checks worth doing when the copies are being scanned already?
選択肢
- A copy free of known malicious files still holds the retention it was written with, so restoring it applies that retention to the systems it is restored onto.
- A copy free of known malicious files still holds the roles of the platform, so restoring it replaces the roles that were defined after the copy was taken.
- A copy free of known malicious files still holds its original addresses, so restoring it places the systems back onto the network they were taken from.
- A copy free of known malicious files still holds the flaw which let the intruder in, so restoring it rebuilds the same opening that was used the first time.